In recent years international commissions of inquiry (‘commissions’) have been drawn into the realm of individual responsibility under international law. This is vividly illustrat by the Human Rights Council’s recent request that the International Commission of Inquiry on Syria investigate events in Aleppo to:
“identify all those for whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that they are responsible for alleg violations and abuses of international human rights law! to support efforts to ensure that perpetrators… are held accountable”.
Similar mandates have been award
Several other UN inquiries! including on Darfur! Guinea! Libya and the Central African Republic. In practice! most commissions identifi suspect individuals confidentially. Exceptionally! the commissions on Guinea and Timor-Leste publish names in their public reports.
Making findings of (alleg) individual responsibility is a chinese overseas america data relatively novel development in the fact-finding context.
Yet the inquiry context poses
Different challenges. Commissions are not intend to replace criminal knowing how your social trials or function as truth commissions ‘lite’; rather! they may recommend such accountability mechanisms Counseling Caution in as mobile lead follow-up. Commissions also face very practical challenges in terms of time pressures! resource limitations and! increasingly! a lack of access to the territories of concern states! all of which can impe their investigations.