To perform a performance test of the hosting servers for our Liquid Web vs. Bluehost comparison, we created a test WordPress site on both hosting servers by signing up for their WordPress hosting plans .
We then installed a default WordPress theme and overseas chinese database uploaded dummy content, including images, to mirror the production environment on our test site.
we also performed some speed test
Load Impact Test: To record how the server responded during peak load time.
Bitcatcha Test: Analyze server response times in 8 different international locations, ignoring the content of the test site.
And here are our results
Both Bluehost and Liquid Web performed consistently well in our load impact test. The number of active visitors to your site has no impact on server performance.
We also use Bitcatcha to track the response time of our hosting servers in 8 different geographic locations: New York, Los Angeles, London, Brazil, . India, Singapore . Japan, and Australia. The speeds in each location are measured three separate times and then the results are averaged.
As you can see . While our Liquid Web site was rated burkina Faso business directory C+ by Bitcatcha, our Bluehost site was rated C.
Winner : Liquid Web
Bluehost vs. Liquid Web – Ease of Use
One of the best things about Bluehost is that it offers a great user experience, which makes it immensely useful for starting a website, even belgium numbers if you’re a complete beginner. With the guided onboarding . You can easily set up WordPress and install your preferred theme without even logging into your WordPress site.