Article 163 in the Criminal Code of t

Russian Federation, which can be used solar energy: how to prospect clients without having to invest in advertising? to incriminate those who either organize attacks on banks or facilitate them in one way or another. It is important that when such a case is detected, the injured party — that is, the bank — takes the case to court. Unfortunately, not everyone does this.

And even if they do, there is little sens

e in it, the article is considered light, and sentences under it are most often suspended. This does not even remotely compare with the consequences of a leak of a huge database — it is like punishing with a fine for a nuclear explosion in the city center.

The position of the Bank of Russia is simple:

the article should be brought to at least medium severity. At least. And it is also very desirable to add to the punishment a ban on engaging in certain types of activity — first of all, in the financial the main activities within the framework markets. And not only for those who directly posted, for example, client data in the public domain. Imagine that someone did not remove the snow from the roof, spring agb directory came, the snow melted and injured a passerby. Who is responsible for this? Not only the janitor who failed to do his job, but also his boss who was negligent. Bank data, as experience shows, is much heavier than any snow. And it hits harder.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top