The detection of suspicious transactions what has chang in search algorithms l to? change compar to the previously existing measures to respond to the detection of money laundering? In the new conditions, both the banks themselves and the regulator will be responsible for KYC measures in banks. How is the responsibility for identifying suspicious transactions of clients distribut between them? How is the conflict of interest eliminat in this situation (two different authors make decisions regarding the same client) and synergistic strengthening of joint actions achiev?
The methods and ways of responding
The fact of identifying suspicious transactions will not undergo any essential changes compar to today. As now, banks will continue to independently perform their functions to identify suspicious transactions.
Would like to emphasize once again that the information
from the ZSK platform is an additional factor for crit institutions influencing the assessment of the risk level of the event successfully attract the audience suspicious transactions by the client. The procure for implementing internal control by banks, including the grounds for applying certain “anti-legalization” powers, is america email establish by them independently in internal documents and depends on the risk level of suspicious transactions by clients.